All optimistic rollups are subject to the same weakness:. Centralized sequencers.

21 Aug 2023, 14:05
All optimistic rollups are subject to the same weakness: Centralized sequencers. There can be, though, a fully open-source solution allowing rollups to become truly decentralized and secured by Ethereum. ๐Ÿงตโฌ‡๏ธ

Same news in other sources

4
MetisDAO
MetisDAOMETIS #191
Telegram
21 Aug 2023, 14:27
#METISNEWS ๐Ÿ”” All optimistic rollups are subject to the same weakness: Centralized sequencers. There can be, though, a fully open-source solution allowing rollups to become truly decentralized and secured by Ethereum. Read the thread ๐Ÿงต
#METISNEWS. All optimistic rollups are subject to the same weakness:. Centralized sequencers.
#METISNEWS ๐Ÿ”” https://twitter.com/metisdao/status/1693625261042872782?s=46&t=R1Npp91OsViMHyM3gdEGVQ All optimistic rollups are subject to the same weakness: Centralized sequencers. There can be, though, a fully open-source solution allowing rollups to become truly decentralized and secured by Ethereum. Read the thread ๐Ÿงต
MetisDAO
MetisDAOMETIS #191
Twitter
21 Aug 2023, 14:05
Luckily, there's a proposed solution. More details soon.
Luckily, there's a proposed solution. More details soon.
Luckily, there's a proposed solution. More details soon.
MetisDAO
MetisDAOMETIS #191
Twitter
21 Aug 2023, 14:05
This is precisely why many of the brigthest minds on Ethereum have pointed out the need for truly secure, and decentralized rollups.
This is precisely why many of the brigthest minds on Ethereum have pointed out the need for truly secure, and decentralized roll
This is precisely why many of the brigthest minds on Ethereum have pointed out the need for truly secure, and decentralized rollups.
MetisDAO
MetisDAOMETIS #191
Twitter
21 Aug 2023, 14:05
Think about it. If there's only one [centralized] sequencer, users are obligued to trust that entity, creating a single point of failure. The whole system would be compromised if that one entity is. A fully functional fraud proof system could alleviate this, but not solve it.
Think about it.
Think about it. If there's only one [centralized] sequencer, users are obligued to trust that entity, creating a single point of failure. The whole system would be compromised if that one entity is. A fully functional fraud proof system could alleviate this, but not solve it.